Friday, May 29, 2009

Random Clicks: 5/29/09


Roaming the sidelines while prepping for a busy weekend ...

Red Sox/MLB
The Boston Herald's Sean McAdam writes about the early season struggles of Jon Lester.
Joe Henderson of the Tampa Tribune comments on the plight of the Rays.
The Providence Journal has a cool slideshow showing big leaguers who have gone through McCoy Stadium.

Patriots/NFL
WEEI.com has posted the audio of the D&C interview with Tom Brady.
The Boston Globe's Mike Reiss reports on the current state of the Vince Wilfork contract negotiations.
Jim Trotter of Sports Illustrated talks about six running backs looking to bounce back in '09 (including new Patriot, Fred Taylor).

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

True Fans (can) Wear Pink!



Full disclosure, my 4-year-old daughter owns a pink Red Sox hat.  She roots for the Sox.  And, she likes the color pink.  So what?  

I was inspired to sound-off on this topic after reading yet another article in which the somewhat sanctimonious writer felt it was necessary to mention that a "Pink Hat" is not a "true" fan.  I find this a bit amusing, given that the twenty or so dollars that caps cost could be much better spent by someone who doesn't root for the team.  Now, I know that the argument will be (and has been) made that these pink-hatted fans couldn't name who the starting shortstop is (and who could, really?) --- but why is that important?  Why does a fan have to be an uber-fan, or not a fan at all?  Can't someone be a casual fan --- someone who gains some joy when the hometown team wins, some pain when they lose, but otherwise goes on with their own life?  As someone who in recent memory has experienced watching Aaron Boone and David Tyree wreak havoc, I can definitely see the appeal of not becoming too invested in the outcome of a sporting event.  Then again, I'm admittedly incurable in that regard.
It should also be noted that a good chunk of the "true" fans of the Red Sox, only became so after the "Impossible Dream" year of 1967.  Should we think less of them for not caring as deeply for a team that hadn't offered much since the retirement of Ted Williams in 1960?  Or for that matter, only a small sampling of post-season intrigue since 1918?  The answer is, of course not.  1967 gave people a team to get excited about, and to rally behind.  The same can be said for 2004, only on a grander scale.  We shouldn't look down on fans who are new to the fold, or who enjoy wearing merchandise of a different color.  We should be excited by the fact that we root for a team that can inspire even casual fans to go out and show their support.
One more thing about my daughter, one of the first phrases that she was able to repeatedly say on her own was "Hit the ball, Big Papi!".  Now, that's what I call a fan.

Friday, May 22, 2009

Tiny note on a weird play

I don't have much to add about this one, but I don't think I've seen it ever before.

In the fifth inning of tonight's Red Sox-Mets game, Daniel Murphy walked. Angel Pagan bunted, Matsuzaka fielded the ball (Lowell briefly charged but dropped back), and threw to first for the out. Daniel Murphy thought Lowell had left third unguarded, so he took off for third, where Lowell fielded Youkilis' throw and tagged our Murphy.

The scoring is: Pagan ground bunts into sacrifice double play.

The Red Sox so far have zero sacrifice bunts. The Mets are tied for second in the NL with 24. And now the Mets are blazing new trails in giving up outs.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

A Perfect Day

As I sit here and reflect on how much I treasure my relationship with my Uncle Charlie, I keep thinking about some really good times that we’ve had together.

One of those days took place back in the summer of ’02.  August 10th, to be exact (more on why I remember the date, momentarily).  There are two things that you need to know about Uncle Charlie --- he loves being out on his boat, and he loves sports.  This day had both.

That Saturday afternoon started out fantastic.  The sun was shining, we had tickets to the Sox, and we were going to start the day by cruising around the ocean in his motorboat.  At the time, I was living in Gloucester, right across the street from the fisherman's statue.   We put in at the ramp by the high school, and headed towards the island lighthouse made famous at the beginning of “The Perfect Storm”.  Things were going great.  We hung out on the water for about an hour (smoking cigars and drinking cold beers, of course), then decided to head in to get ready for the game --- and that’s when the engine died.  Now admittedly, I was mostly panicking because I did not want to miss the game … but the thought that we might drift off to Ireland did cross my mind.  Luckily, after about 20 minutes or so of bobbing around the water, the harbormaster came by in his boat and towed us back in.  We were back on track.

After quickly locking up the boat, we headed into town.  We had no idea who was pitching that day, but we figured it out soon enough.  As we got closer to the park, all we could see were people carrying around “K”s--- a sure sign that we had stumbled onto a PEDRO MARTINEZ GAME (capital letters are essential when referring to the Pedro of that era).  To give you a sense of how dominating he was that year, he went 20-4 with a 2.26 ERA … and finished 2nd in both the Cy Young and MVP races.  Most importantly, he did not disappoint on that day.  The Sox won 2-0, and Pedro pitched 8 innings allowing only 4 hits, and striking out 8 batters.  Just another day at the office.  We had a blast, and I still use my Nomar souvenir cup --- which is perfect for iced coffee, or other assorted beverages.

While watching Pedro dominate, we kept smiling and talking about how lucky we were to be able to enjoy the type of day we were having.  That’s one of the gifts that my uncle has given me --- the presence of mind to reflect on the good things, while they’re happening.

As good as the events of that day were, the best part was the company.  Uncle Charlie is coming to the end of a valiant battle against cancer.  I saw him earlier today, and was able to tell him how much he’s meant to me over the years.  How much I loved spending time with him, and how much I learned from him … including a love of the game of tennis, despite the fact that I was only able to beat him once over the course of 10 years.  I don’t know if he was able to understand everything I said, but every now and then I could see that spark behind his eyes --- the one that would show up each time Pedro rung someone up on that hot August afternoon.

If only the Indians could play by Little League rules...

In tonight's Red Sox broadcast, Joe Castiglione commented that people who travel with the Indians say that they'd have a pretty good record if the game ended after the 6th. That sounds juicy, and it just feels right. I mean, Rafael Perez has an ERA of 15.19!

But statements this pithy are rarely as true as they sound. Thanks to the brilliant resources available online, it's something that can easily be tested for veracity. How true is it, if taken literally?

Not very. The Indians' pen has been legitimately bad but rarely have they affected the outcome of a game from the 7th inning on. They have had some bad outings that might lead people to think that they are singlehandedly losing games for the Tribe, but it's not really the case. Here are some notable games:
  • April 14: Indians are losing after 6, and the game gets out of reach in the 8th
  • April 15: tied after 6, Indians win the last three innings and the game
  • April 16: tied after 6, Indians score 9 in the 7th, win
  • April 17: winning after 6, allow runs in 7th and 8th, lose to NYY (-1 win in the standings because of the bullpen)
  • April 19: winning after 6, allow 6 runs in last three, lose to NYY (-2)
  • April 21: winning after 6 and win the game, but the pen allow 6 runs in the 7th and 8th
  • April 23: losing after 6, score 4 in the bottom of the 8th versus KC to win (back to -1 win in the standings - credit the bullpen here)
  • April 28: tied after 6, lose in bottom of the 9th to Red Sox
  • April 29: winning after 6, lose in 10th to Red Sox (back to -2)
  • May 2: losing after 6 and go onto lose the game to Detroit, but the Indians gain and lose the lead in last third of the game
  • May 3: tied after 6, lose last third
  • May 4: losing after 6 to Toronto, win in extras (add a game in the standings and get back to -1)
  • May 5: losing after 6 and lose the game to Blue Jays, but gain and lose lead in last third
So entering tonight's game with the Red Sox, the Indians stand at 10-17. If the games lasted as long as Little League games do (that darned bullpen!), they'd be...11-16, and still in last place in the AL Central.

Perhaps you ding the bullpen for the 2 games the Indians lost when tied after the 6th, but you also have to credit them for the 2 games that went the other way. So no change there.

And no doubt, those two games were the Indians took the lead late only to lose it again sting. But those lead changes took place after our magical 6th-inning cutoff.

Much of the 7th+ inning failure has come against the Yankees and Red Sox (both walk-off victories for the Red Sox), and the successes came against Kansas City and Toronto. That bias towards big-market teams is making people in this story remember the Boston and New York games and forget the others.

Yes, the Indians pen is bad, Joe. But don't foist upon them losses which are not theirs to take.

Friday, May 1, 2009

Mr. Consistency


With the current state of the Red Sox starting rotation, I thought it would be a good time to reflect on the man who is currently 2-1 with a 1.86 ERA.  Of course, going into the season I don't think anyone thought that Tim Wakefield would be arguably the brightest star of the rotation after one month.  Now, obviously its a bit early to be penciling him in for the Cy Young --- but he's definitely deserving of some praise.  
Like him or not, and I suspect most people do have a soft spot for him, no one can deny the professionalism that he's brought to the ball club as he enters into his 15th season with the club.  Let me note that again --- this is his 15th season with the Red Sox.
To put that into a little historical perspective, note the following for the year in which he threw his first pitch for the team (a season that saw him go 16-8, and finish 3rd in Cy Young voting):
  • Gallon of gasoline = $1.15
  • Top 3 grossing movies: Toy Story, Batman Forever, Apollo 13
  • Top 3 TV shows: ER, Seinfeld, Friends
When all is said and done his numbers will most likely not be good enough for any serious Hall of Fame consideration.  However, this should not stop the Sox from retiring his number.  A precedent has been set with the well-deserved (and long over-due) retiring of Johnny Pesky's number.  If the love of (and apparent love for) the fans carries any weight, no one will be wearing number #49 after Wake throws his last knuckler.  Should that not be enough, one only needs to look at the selfless way he has allowed himself to be moved in and out of the bullpen --- notably recording 15 save in 1999, or the fact that when all is said and done he'll probably be the winningest pitcher in Red Sox history.  
Here's how the top 3 currently rank:
  1. Roger Clemens, Cy Young: 192 wins each
  2. Tim Wakefield: 166 wins
Wouldn't it be nice to have a class-act all by himself at number one on at that list?