Before I go on about my actual topic, it may not have escaped your notice that Chien-Ming Wang got shelled – again – in his last start. He went on the DL afterwards. And while I’m not the first one to note these figures, it is still interesting to note that:
- Opposing hitters are hitting .622 against him
- He came into game three with a 28.93 ERA, and saw it rise to 34.50
- If he can pitch 48 and two-third consecutive scoreless innings (Orel Herschiser’s ML consecutive-scoreless-innings record is 59 innings), he can get his ERA back to his career average
So onto my actual topic.
There are a lot of reasons baseball is my favorite sport. The losing team will always get a chance to catch up. It has a long history of people playing essentially the same game. Among American sports, it is the sport best set up for analysis. There is a voluminous literature about the sport, written by very talented and passionate writers.
Then there's the name "utility player." Who would object to that title? I hope that people in my life at least consider me useful, if not a star or a headline-grabber.
They toil in near anonymity. This too is like most of us, good enough at what we do to make some kind of living but not leaders in our chosen field.
(How anonymous? Both of the readers of this site are probably familiar with the Red Sox, so let’s play Name That Red Sox Utility Player.
Player A played for the 2003 Red Sox. It was his only season with
Player B played for the 1999 Red Sox, his second of three seasons for
Answers at bottom.)
Even though anonymous, they are easy to find, thanks to sportwriters' clichés. If you want to know a team’s utility player, search on "(team name) utility man." For instance, at one point or another, someone has referred to Laynce Nix, Jamey Carroll, Jeff Baker, Clint Barmes, and Greg Norton as the "
If you like The Blue Jays, Jose Bautista is your man. He's played 1B, 2B, 3B, RF, CF, LF, and DH. He sports a career .239 average with some power but very little plate discipline, and yet has found gainful employment with
So the next time a veteran late-inning defensive replacement comes in to a game, look him up. See where he’s been and what his skills are. And cheer for the guy to keep proving his utility for as many teams as will take him.
Next time, I’ll have a short history of the ultimate utility player: the pinch-pitcher.
Answers:
I got Jackson, but whiffed on Sadler. Who would you consider the ultimate pitching utility player for the Sox (if such a thing existed)? If he hadn't had a somewhat distinguised career as a starter, my vote would be for Wakefield. He's done everything that's been asked of him --- starter, middle reliever, and even closer.
ReplyDeleteIn my lifetime I can’t think of a more utilitarian pitcher than Wakefield. However, a little research turned up Jack Wilson, a pitcher for the late-30s and early-40s Red Sox. From 1935-1941, Wilson averaged 16 starts, 13 games finished, and 8 games as a middle reliever (though it’s possible those 8 games of middle relief were simply games he wasn’t effective enough to finish).
ReplyDeleteIn his best season, 1937, he went 16-10, threw 14 complete games, closed 23 other games, and appeared in still other roles in another 7 games.
He was overshadowed by teammates Lefty Grove (HOF), Wes Ferrell (All Star), and Bobo Newsom (future All Star).
I can’t verify this right now, but I bet most teams in the four-man-rotation era would have had a guy like Wilson: good enough to start when needed but able to pitch in whatever situation.